MOU ZONGSAN’S MORAL METAPHYSICS: POST-KANTIANISM AND NEO-CONFUCIANISM
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article describes the main points of Mou Zongsan’s moral metaphysics as a new stage in the development of modern Neo-Confucianism. It presents the criticism of Western logic and epistemology and the introduction of new concepts, which should overcome the shortcomings of the philosophy of Kant. It was noted that Mou Zongsan used the concept of “intellectual intuition” (智的直觉, zhì de zhíjué) to explain the Neo-Confucian moral knowledge that implements the original essence and original mind. The present article proved that the Mou Zongsan’s philosophical system is an alternative to Western spirituality in the form of a combination of Confucian tradition and Confucian moral metaphysics with Western theoretical terms and concepts.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
epistemology, logic, Moral Metaphysics, Mou Zongsan, Neo-Confucianism, Post-Kantianism
Кант И. Критика чистого разума // Кант И. Сочинения в шести томах. Т. 3. Москва, 1964.
Кант И. Критика практического разума // Кант И. Сочинения в шести томах. Т. 4. Ч. 1. Москва, 1965.
Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время. Москва, 1997.
Asakura T. On Buddhistic Ontology: a Comparative Study of Mou Zongsan and Kyoto School Philosophy // Philosophy East and West. Vol. 61, № 4. October 2011. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2011.0062
Chan Wing-cheuk. The Primacy of the Other: Levinas and Mahayana Buddhism // Phenomenological Inquiry, 1998, № 22.
Chan Wing-Cheuk. Mou Zongsan’s Transformation of Kant’s Philosophy // Journal of Chinese Philosophy. Vol. 33, № 1. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00340.x
Chan Wing-tsit. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, 1963.
Liu Shu-hsien. Essentials of Contemporary Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Westport, 2003.
Schmidt S. Mou Zongsan, Hegel, and Kant: the Quest for Confucian modernity // Philosophy East & West. Vol. 61, № 2. April 2011. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2011.0029
Tu Xiaofei. Dare to Compare: The Comparative Philosophy of Mou Zongsan // Kritike. Vol. 1, № 2. December 2007. https://doi.org/10.25138/1.2.a.3
[Збірник нарисів з досліджень сучасного нового конфуціанства] 現代新儒學研究論集 / [Фан Келі] 方克立， [Лі Цзіньчуань] 李錦全 (eds.). [Пекін] 北京, 1991.
[Моу Цзунсань] 牟宗三。Філософія історії 歷史哲學。[Тайбей] 臺北, .1955
[Моу Цзунсань] 牟宗三。[Критика розуму, що пізнає] 認識心之批判。Мічиган, 密西根 1956.
[Моу Цзунсань] 牟宗三。Моральний ідеалізм 道德的理想主義。[Тайбей] 臺北, .1959
[Моу Цзунсань] 牟宗三。Метафізичний розум та метафізична природа 心體與性體。[Тайбей] 臺北， 1968–9.
[Моу Цзунсань] 牟宗三。Інтелектуальна інтуїція та китайська філософія 智的直覺與中國哲學。 [Тайбей] 臺北，1971.
[Моу Цзунсань] 牟宗三。Від Лу Сяншаня до Лю Цзішаня 從陸象山倒劉蕺山。 [Тайбей] 臺北，1979a.
[Моу Цзунсань] 牟宗三。[Школа імен та Сюнь-цзи] 名家與荀子。[Тайбей] 臺北，1979b.
[Моу Цзунсань] 牟宗三。[Про вище благо] 圓善論。[Тайбей] 臺北，1985.
[Фан Келі] 方克立。 [Дослідження сучасного нового конфуціанства і китайська модернізація] 現代新儒學與中國現代化。[Тяньцзінь] 天津, 1997.
[Фу Вейсюнь] 傅偉勳。[Критичне успадкування та творчий розвиток] 批判的繼承與創造的發展。[Тайбей] 臺北, 1986.
[Чжен Цзядун] 鄭家棟。[Буття та метод] 本體與方法。[Шеньян] 沈阳, 1992.
REFERENCES
Kant I. (1964), “Kritika chistogo razuma”, in Kant I., Sochineniya v shesti tomakh, Vol. 3, Moscow. (In Russian).
Kant I. (1965), “Kritika prakticheskogo razuma”, in Kant I., Sochineniya v shesti tomakh, Vol. 4, Part 1, Moscow. (In Russian).
Khaydegger M. (1997), Bytiye i vremya, Moscow. (In Russian).
Asakura T. (2011), “On Buddhistic Ontology: a Comparative Study of Mou Zongsan and Kyoto School Philosophy”, Philosophy East and West, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 647–678. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2011.0062
Chan Wing-cheuk (1998), “The Primacy of the Other: Levinas and Mahayana Buddhism”, Phenomenological Inquiry, No. 22, pp. 125–139.
Chan Wing-Cheuk (2006), “Mou Zongsan’s Transformation of Kant’s Philosophy”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00340.x
Chan Wing-tsit (1963), A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy, Princeton.
Liu Shu-hsien (2003), Essentials of Contemporary Neo-Confucian Philosophy, Westport.
Schmidt S. (2011), “Mou Zongsan, Hegel, and Kant: the Quest for Confucian modernity”, Philosophy East & West, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 260–302. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2011.0029
Tu Xiaofei (2007), “Dare to Compare: The Comparative Philosophy of Mou Zongsan”, Kritike, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 24–35. https://doi.org/10.25138/1.2.a.3
Xiandai xin ruxue yanjiu lunji (1991), Fang Keli and Li Jinquan (Eds.), Beijing. (In Chinese).
Mou Zongsan (1955), Lishi zhexue, Taibei. (In Chinese).
Mou Zongsan (1956), Renshi xin zhi pipan, Mixigen. (In Chinese).
Mou Zongsan (1959), Daode de lixiang zhuyi, Taibei. (In Chinese).
Mou Zongsan (1968-9), Xin ti yu xing ti, Taibei. (In Chinese).
Mou Zongsan (1971), Zhi de zhijue yu zhongguo zhexue, Taibei. (In Chinese).
Mou Zongsan (1979a), Cung lu xiangshan dao liujishan, Taibei. (In Chinese).
Mou Zongsan (1979b), Mingjia yu xunzi, Taibei. (In Chinese).
Mou Zongsan (1985), Yuan shan lun, Taibei. (In Chinese).
Fang Keli (1997), Xiandai xin ruxue yu zhongguo xiandaihua, Tianjin. (In Chinese).
Fu Weixun (1986), Pipan de jicheng yu chuangzao de fazhan, Taibei. (In Chinese).
Zheng Jiadong (1992), Benti yu fangfa, Shenyang. (In Chinese).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.