PERSPECTIVES OF A SPECULATIVE APPROACH TO THE DESCRIPTION OF ARABIC GRAMMAR
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Grammar paradigms traditionally occupy a leading place in the description of the grammatical system of the language. Along with this, the basis of the language paradigmatic is the idea of targeting a set of idealized forms that can be used as the most typical patterns for describing grammatical phenomena that actually exist in the language. Within this publication, the search for principles of analysis of the grammatical system of Arabic, common to Western Arabistics and traditional Arabic linguistics. One of the approaches that is relevant in this context is, in the opinion of the author, the use of speculative constructions to determine the theoretical bases of the above principles of a language. Moreover, usually the scientific theories are built for an idealized object, so the understanding of the correlation of these objects with real phenomenon existing in the language is necessary. Western Arabic uses paradigms, designed for describing European languages, primarily the Latin language, to characterize the grammatical phenomena of the Arabic language, and the Arabic linguistic tradition relies on specific patterns of grammatical phenomena present in classical Arabic. At the same time, both traditions widely use such technique as judgment by analogy, well known in logic. However, for our research, the main thing is that both of the above approaches use an idealized representation that makes a universalized approach to the description of the grammatical system of a language possible. As we can see, to universalize the description of a specific linguistic phenomenon, idealization is a necessary operation. According to the author, one of the speculative methods that it is expedient to use to achieve the goal of the proposed research is the phenomenological method. Phenomenological theories are used not only in the humanities, but in physics and technology, where this method makes it possible to describe the most common relationships between parameters, the specific meanings of which are established statistically. The author concludes that we often deal with idealized descriptions of grammatical phenomena in Arabic objects whose properties are determined by similarity lines, by virtue of which these phenomena can be described with the help of speculative inferences having speculative origin.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Arabic language, Arabic linguistic tradition, grammatical system, phenomenological method
Александрова А. В. Философская сущность и историко-философский смысл тезиса Протагора // Вісник Національного авіаційного університету. Серія: Філософія. Культурологія. 2014. № 2 (20).
Введение в философию: Учеб. пособие для вузов. 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва, 2003.
Гайденко П. П. Научная рациональность и философский разум. Москва, 2003.
Гуссерль Э. Идеи к чистой феноменологии и феноменологической философии. Т. 1. Москва, 1999.
Гуссерль Э. Картезианские медитации / Пер. с нем. В. И. Молчанова. Москва, 2010.
Демьянков В. З. Термин парадигма в обыденном языке и в лингвистике // Парадигмы научного знания в современной лингвистике. Москва, 2006.
Детистова А. С. Феноменология восприятия Э. Гуссерля: имманентный и трансцендентный планы // Вестник РГГУ, 2012, № 17 (97).
Кононец Д. В. Обзор международной конференции “Воплощённая интерсубъективность между феноменологическим и экспериментальным исследованием” (3–4 июня 2013, Прага, Чешская Республика) // Horizon. Феноменологические исследования. Т. 2 (2). Санкт-Петербург, 2013.
Куликов С. Б. Феноменологический подход – ключ к пониманию причин трансформации философских образов науки // Horizon. Феноменологические исследования. Т. 2 (2). Санкт-Петербург, 2013.
ЛЭС. – Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. Москва, 1990.
Лосский Н. О. Умозрение как метод философии // Логос. Международный ежегодник по философии культуры. Кн. I. Прага, 1925.
Розова С. С. М. А. Розов об идеальных объектах теории // Философия науки, 2013, № 4 (59).
Рыбас А. Е. Н. О. Лосский как критик позитивизма // Вече. Журнал русской философии и культуры. Вып. 22. 2011.
Философский словарь / Под ред. Фролова И. Т. 7-е изд. Москва, 2001.
Фролов Д. В. Способы определения понятий в традиционной арабской грамматике. // Арабская филология: грамматика, стихосложение, корановедение. Статьи разных лет. Москва, 2006. (Studia Philologica).
Хамрай А. А. Феноменологическое измерение арабской грамматики // Проблемы общей и востоковедной лингвистики 2013. Два выдающихся востоковеда: К 90-летию со дня рождения И. Ф. Вардуля и Ю. А. Рубинчика. Труды научной конференции, ИВ РАН 20 ноября 2013 г. Москва, 2014.
Хамрай О. О. Перспективи застосування феноменологічного підходу в описі арабської граматики // Східний світ, 2016, № 4.
Broad C. D. Some Methods of Speculative Philosophy // Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. Vol. 21, Issue 1. 6 July 1947. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/21.1.1
Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of Perception. London, 2012.
Owens J. The foundations of grammar: an introduction to medieval Arabic grammatical theory. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 1988.
Sparrow T. The End of Phenomenology: Metaphysics and the New Realism. Edinburgh, 2014.
Zahavi D. The end of what? Phenomenology vs. speculative realism // International Journal of Philosophical Studies. Vol. 24, No. 3. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2016.1175101
Al-Anbārī. Kitābu l’asrāri l-‛arabīyya [Книга таємниць арабської мови] / Taħqīq M. al-Bīţār. Dimašq, 1957.
REFERENCES
Aleksandrova A. V. (2014), “Filosofskaya sushchnost’ i istoriko-filosofskiy smysl tezisa Protagora”, in Visnyk Natsional’noho aviatsiynoho universytetu, No. 2 (20), pp. 5–10. (In Russian).
Vvedeniye v filosofiyu: Ucheb. posobiye dlya vuzov (2003), 3rd ed., Respublika, Moscow. (In Russian).
Gaydenko P. P. (2003), Nauchnaya ratsional’nost’ i filosofskiy razum, Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow. (In Russian).
Gusserl’ E. (1999), Idei k chistoy fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoy filosofii, Vol. 1, DIK, Moscow. (In Russian).
Gusserl’ E. (2010), Kartezianskiye meditatsii, Transl. from the German by V. I. Molchanov, Akademicheskiy proyekt, Moscow. (In Russian).
Dem’yankov V. Z. (2006), “Termin paradigma v obydennom yazyke i v lingvistike”, in Paradigmy nauchnogo znaniya v sovremennoy lingvistike, INION RAN, Moscow, pp. 15– 40. (In Russian).
Detistova A. S. (2012), “Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya E. Gusserlya: immanentnyy i transtsendentnyy plany”, in Vestnik RGGU, No. 17 (97), pp. 24–32. (In Russian).
Kononets D. V. (2013), Obzor mezsdunarodnoy konferentsii “Voploshchennaya intersub’’ek-tivnost’ mezsdu fenomenologicheskim I eksperimental’nym issledovaniyem” (3–4 iyunya 2013, Praga, Cheshskaya respublika), in Horizon. Fenomenologicheskiye issledovaniya, Vol. 2 (2), Sankt-Peterburg, pp. 61–74. (In Russian).
Kulikov S. B. (2013), “Fenomenologicheskiy podkhod – klyuch k ponimaniyu prichin transformatsii filosofskikh obrazov nauki”, in Horizon. Fenomenologicheskiye issledovaniya, Vol. 2 (2), Sankt-Peterburg, pp. 61–74. (In Russian).
Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ (1990), Sovet. entsikl., Moscow. (In Russian).
Losskiy N. O. (1925), “Umozreniye kak metod filosofii”, in Logos. Mezhdunarodnyy ezhegodnik po filosofii kul’tury, Book I, Praga, pp. 41–50. (In Russian).
Rozova S. S. (2013), “M. A. Rozov ob ideal’nykh ob”yektakh teorii”, in Filosofiya nauki, No. 4 (59), pp. 61–74. (In Russian).
Rybas A. E. (2011), “N. O. Losskiy kak kritik pozitivizma”, in Veche. Zhurnal russkoy filosofii i kul’tury, Issue 22, pp. 87–105. (In Russian).
Filosofskiy slovar’ (2001), Frolov I. T. (Ed.), 7th ed., Respublika, Moscow. (In Russian).
Frolov D. V. (2006), “Sposoby opredeleniya ponyatiy v traditsionnoy arabskoy grammatike”, in Arabskaya filologiya: grammatika, stikhoslozheniye, koranovedeniye. Stat’i raznykh let, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury, Moscow, pp. 65–93. (In Russian).
Khamray A. A. (2014), “Fenomenologicheskoye izmereniye arabskoy grammatiki”, in Problemy obshchey i vostokovednoy lingvistiki 2013. Dva vydayushchikhsya vostokoveda: K 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya I. F. Vardulya i Yu. A. Rubinchika. Trudy nauchnoy konferentsii, IV RAN 20 noyabrya 2013 g., Institut vostokovedeniya RAN, Moscow, pp. 39–50. (In Russian).
Khamray O. O. (2016), “Perspektyvy zastosuvannya fenomenolohichnoho pidkhodu v opysi arabs’koyi hramatyky”, Shìdnij svìt, No. 4, pp. 111–117. (In Ukrainian).
Broad C. D. (1947), “Some Methods of Speculative Philosophy”, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, Vol. 21, Issue 1, pp.1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/21.1.1
Merleau-Ponty M. (2012), Phenomenology of Perception, Routledge, London.
Owens J. (1988), The foundations of grammar: an introduction to medieval Arabic grammatical theory, John Benjamin publ. comp., Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
Sparrow T. (2014), The End of Phenomenology: Metaphysics and the New Realism, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Zahavi D. (2016), “The end of what? Phenomenology vs. speculative realism”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2016.1175101
Al-Anbārī (1957), Kitābu l’asrāri l-‛arabīyya, Taħqīq M. al-Bīţār, Al-Mağma‘u l-‘Ilmī l-‘Arabī, Damascus. (In Arabic).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.