Social Service of ISKCON Adherents during the War in the Context of Cultural Identity

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Yulia Fil

  Mikolai Karpitsky

Abstract

The article aims to demonstrate the direct connection between social service within Ukrainian ISKCON and religious identity, since for ISKCON adherents, service outside the temple is in most cases not just charity, but also fulfills a religious purpose. This means that the deprivation of charitable activities of religious attributes may indicate a gradual loss of religious identity and its replacement with ideological identification in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war. In this regard, the authors analyzed the charitable activities of ISKCON in Ukraine and in the Ukrainian territories occupied by Russia. It was concluded that the representatives of Ukrainian ISKCON have not lost their religious identity, while the Society in the occupied territories might experience a crisis of religious identity.

To understand the nature of the religious identity of Ukrainian Vaishnavas in its correlation with the national identity, a new concept was introduced – the “vector of cultural consciousness”. In both national and so-called “universalist” identities, two vectors of cultural consciousness can be distinguished: introverted and extroverted. In the first case, the introverted vector can help mobilize society in the face of an external threat, or it can lead to cultural isolation, which inevitably leads to its impoverishment and loss of attractiveness even for its speakers. The extroverted vector of national identity promotes intercultural communication. In a “universalist” identity, i.e., one that is primarily focused on universal rather than national culture, the introverted vector of cultural consciousness will mean the absolutization of the culture that is considered universal, which leads to the devaluation of national cultures and the denial of the value of cultural diversity, as well as to religious escapism – the escape from the world into one’s own inner religious life. Meanwhile, the extroverted vector implies the ability to see the value of other cultures and cultural diversity from the perspective of a particular cultural tradition, in this case, from the perspective of Vaishnava (Vedic) culture. Ukrainian Vaishnavas, who have a rather “universalist” identity, are characterized by an extroverted vector of cultural consciousness – they perceive Vaishnava culture in a universalist sense, that is, as one that is important for the world as a whole, not just for India. Accordingly, Ukrainian culture is not devoid of value for them either; it is only inferior in its importance to the universal Vaishnava culture.

The activity of the “Food for Life” charitable mission demonstrates a very powerful trend in line with the extroverted vector of universalist cultural consciousness. Despite the fact that in most cases the mission does not set missionary tasks and does not preach religion openly during the mission, ISKCON followers perceive their participation in its activities as both a religious and civic duty, while maintaining all the signs of their own religious identity. However, the Society does not yet have clear answers to what extent its charitable activities should spread and whether they should cover the military struggle against external aggression. One can observe a general trend of gradual increase in the use of the Ukrainian language and attention to Ukrainian culture, support for the Ukrainian military and participation in the defense of their country against Russian aggression.

How to Cite

Fil, Y., & Karpitsky, M. (2025). Social Service of ISKCON Adherents during the War in the Context of Cultural Identity. The World of the Orient, (1 (126), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2025.01.117
Article views: 36 | PDF Downloads: 18

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Gaudiya Vaishnavism; ISKCON; Vaishnavism; identity; Russian-Ukrainian war; “Food for Life”

References

Релігійні ідентичності в їх сутності і конфесійних виявах: український контекст (2021), А. Колодний, Л. Филипович, А. Арістова (ред.), УАР, Київ.

Філь Ю. С. (2020), “Універсальність вайшнавізму та місце української культури в ISKCON”, Східний світ, № 2, с. 101–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2020.02.101

Філь Ю. С. & Карпіцький М. М. (2021), “Захист вайшнавами ISKCON власної ідентичності в контексті дискусій про індуїзм”, Східний світ, № 1, с. 102–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2021.01.102

Філь Ю. С. & Карпіцький М. М. (2024), “ISKCON в Україні: відповіді на виклики російсько-української війни”, Східний світ, № 4, c. 87–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2024.04.087

Чумаченко А. (2007), “Історичні витоки, релігійна практика та асиміляція конфесії Свідомості Крішни в українському контексті”, Українське релігієзнавство, № 44, с. 289–293.

Шринивас М. Н. (1988), Запомнившаяся деревня, Наука, Москва.

Burt A. R. (2024), “Hare Krishna in the Twenty-First Century”, ISKCON Communications Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009063623

Coolidge R. D. (2022), “Dharma of Bhakti, Dharma of Mlecchas: Muslim engagement with Gaudīya Vaisnavism as a living tradition”, ISKCON Communications Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 151–166.

Davis A., Suer R. and Wurzelbacher J. (2021), “Vegetarianism at New Vrindaban”, in A Collection of Research on the Practices of the Hindu Community of New Vrindaban, The Global Leadership Center, Ohio University, For the Harvard Pluralism Project, pp. 30–36, available at: https://hwpi.harvard.edu/files/pluralismarchive/files/newvrindaban_2011_1.pdf (accessed January 15, 2025).

Karpitsky N. (2023), “Modern Warfare and Kshatriya Duty Through the Lens of the Mahabharata”, Journal of Vaishnava Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 57–71.

Kaviraja K. (1925), Shree Shree Chaitanya Charitamritam, transl. into Eng. by Banerjee N. R., Bhudeb Publishing House, Calcutta.

King A. S. (2012), “Krishna’s prasadam: ‘eating our way back to godhead’ ”, Material Religion: The Journal of Objects, Art and Belief, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 440–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/175183412X13522006994773

Radhanath Swami (2016), The Journey Within: Exploring the Path of Bhakti, A Contemporary Guide to Yoga’s Ancient Wisdom, Mandala, San Rafael.

Soyav M., Kumar V. & Shiwani K. (2023), “Perception of Devotees towards Food as Prasad”, International Journal for Multidimensional Research Perspectives (IJMRP), Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 30–37, available at: https://www.chandigarhphilosophers.com/index.php/ijmrp/article/view/85 (accessed 15 January 2025).

Weber M. (2004), Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus, Vollständige Ausgabe, Verlag C. H. Beck, München.

REFERENCES

Relihiini identychnosti v yikh sutnosti i konfesiinykh vyiavakh: ukrainskyi kontekst (2021), A. Kolodnyi, L. Fylypovych & A. Aristova (eds), UAR, Kyiv. (In Ukrainian).

Fil Yu. S. (2020), “Universalnist vaishnavizmu ta mistse ukrainskoi kultury v ISKCON”, Shìdnij svìt, No. 2, pp. 101–112. (In Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2020.02.101

Fil Yu. S. & Karpitskyi M. M. (2021), “Zakhyst vaishnavamy ISKCON vlasnoi identychnosti v konteksti dyskusii pro induizm”, Shìdnij svìt, No. 1, pp. 102–117. (In Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2021.01.102

Fil Yu. S. & Karpitskyi M. M. (2024), “ISKCON v Ukraini: vidpovidi na vyklyky Rosiisko-ukrainskoi viiny”, Shìdnij svìt, No. 4, pp. 87–105. (In Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2024.04.087

Chumachenko A. (2007), “Istorychni vytoky, relihiina praktyka ta asymiliatsiia konfesii Svidomosti Krishny v ukrainskomu konteksti”, Ukrainske relihiieznavstvo, No. 44, pp. 289–293. (In Ukrainian).

Shrinivas M. N. (1988), Zapomnivshayasya derevnya, Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian).

Burt A. R. (2024), “Hare Krishna in the Twenty-First Century”, ISKCON Communications Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 69–84.

Coolidge R. D. (2022), “Dharma of Bhakti, Dharma of Mlecchas: Muslim engagement with Gaudīya Vaisnavism as a living tradition”, ISKCON Communications Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 151–166.

Davis A., Suer R. & Wurzelbacher J. (2021), “Vegetarianism at New Vrindaban”, in A Collection of Research on the Practices of the Hindu Community of New Vrindaban, The Global Leadership Center, Ohio University, For the Harvard Pluralism Project, pp. 30–36, available at: https://hwpi.harvard.edu/files/pluralismarchive/files/newvrindaban_2011_1.pdf (accessed January 15, 2025).

Karpitsky N. (2023), “Modern Warfare and Kshatriya Duty Through the Lens of the Mahabharata”, Journal of Vaishnava Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 57–71.

Kaviraja K. (1925), Shree Shree Chaitanya Charitamritam, transl. into Eng. by Banerjee N. R., Bhudeb Publishing House, Calcutta.

King A. S. (2012), “Krishna’s prasadam: ‘eating our way back to godhead’ ”, Material Religion: The Journal of Objects, Art and Belief, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 440–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/175183412X13522006994773

Radhanath Swami (2016), The Journey Within: Exploring the Path of Bhakti, A Contemporary Guide to Yoga’s Ancient Wisdom, San Rafael, Mandala.

Soyav M., Kumar V. & Shiwani K. (2023), “Perception of Devotees towards Food as Prasad”, International Journal for Multidimensional Research Perspectives (IJMRP), Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 30–37, available at: https://www.chandigarhphilosophers.com/index.php/ijmrp/article/view/85 (accessed 15 January 2025).

Weber M. (2004), Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus, Vollständige Ausgabe, Verlag C. H. Beck, München.