Philosophy and Culture of Scientific Work in Japan: Myths and Realities

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Oleh Kubalskyi

  Mykhailo Boichenko

Abstract

In the self-assessment of the achievements of modern Japanese science, there are two opposite philosophical positions – a deep respect for the Japanese national spirit and adopted in the West critical instruction, aimed at identifying one’s own shortcomings. It was found that these two positions find their reconciliation in the culture of unceasing self-improvement of scientists in the direction of the culture of scientific research and the culture of interaction between scientists, state institutions and public initiatives. Science education and science communication are considered as two key concepts that characterize the way of state and public management of science in Japan and express the essence of the Japanese culture of scientific work. It was revealed that the myth of closedness of Japanese science is being overcome in scientific education in Japan, and the myth of strict state control over the development of science is being overcome in scientific communication in Japan. Also, the predominantly directive way of state management of the development of science is being replaced by a multi-paradigm culture of science management, which includes, in addition to state orders, a more active position of research scientists, as well as non-state social networks for the dissemination of scientific information and the institutionalization of scientists’ promotion of their messages to society. Japanese scientists agree that science education in Japan should raise the academic level of popularization of science, science communication should weaken vertical state patronage by building additional horizontal scientific networks and encouraging the creation of public institutions to support science, and Japanese spirit should become the world brand of Japanese science, which requires a wider inclusion of Japanese science in English-language scientific communication. It was determined that the philosophy of non-linearity and diversity appears as a new basis of the culture of scientific work in Japan.

How to Cite

Kubalskyi, O., & Boichenko, M. (2024). Philosophy and Culture of Scientific Work in Japan: Myths and Realities. The World of the Orient, (2 (123), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2024.02.144
Article views: 186 | PDF Downloads: 86

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

culture of scientific work; modern Japanese science; multi-paradigm culture of science management; myths; philosophy of non-linearity and diversity; science communication; science education

References

Graupe S. (2006), “The Locus of Science and Its Place in Japanese Culture: Nishida on the Relationship of Science and Culture”, in Heisig J. W. (ed.), Frontiers in Japanese Philosophy, Vol. 1, Nanzan Institute for Religion & Culture, Nagoya, pp. 69–98.

Huh D. (2023), “Politicizing ‘Learning by Doing’: Shiono Naomichi and the Cultivation of the ‘Japanese Spirit’ in Primary and Secondary Science Education in Japan from 1931–1958”, Science & Education, pp. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00472-1

Ikarashi A. (2023), “Japanese research is no longer world class – here’s why”, Nature, Vol. 623 (7985), pp. 14–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03290-1

Isozaki T. (2022), “A Historical Perspective of Science Education in Japan: Which Way is it Headed in the Future?”, Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 167–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2022.37.2.8

Isozaki T. (2018), “Science teacher education in Japan: past, present, and future”, Asia-Pacific Science Education, Vol. 4, Issue 10, pp. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0027-2

Johnson C. (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975, Stanford University Press, Stanford. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804765602

Kitaro N. (2023), “Doslidzhennia blaha. Chastyna I, hlava 2–4. Pereklad z yaponskoi, vstupna stattia ta komentari S. V. Kapranova”, Shìdnij svìt, No. 3, pp. 179–195. (In Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2023.03.179

Koso A. (2021), “The press club as indicator of science medialization: How Japanese research organizations adapt to domestic media conventions”, Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 30, Issue 2, pp. 139–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520972269

Koso A. and Alvarez A. (2018), “The land of rising science communication: The first Japan Scicom Forum”, Journal of Science Communication, Vol. 17, Issue 03, pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17030601

Kubalskyi O. (2023), “The image of science in a socially turbulent society”, Synesis, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 471–482, available at: https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2712 (accessed April 15, 2024).

Kubalskyi O. and Boichenko M. (2024), “The Culture of Scientific Work: Philosophy and Experience of the Republic of Korea”, Shìdnij svìt, No. 1, pp. 191–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2024.01.191

Liu Q. and Takahashi N. (2021), “Career perspective: Motivation of Chinese employees graduating from Chinese universities and working for Japanese companies”, Annals of Business Administrative Science, Vol. 20, pp. 63–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7880/abas.0210213a

Low M. (2009), “The History of Japanese Science: Recent Developments”, East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 519–524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/s12280-009-9111-8

Miyamoto Y. and Ryff C. D. (2022), “Culture and Health: Recent Developments and Future Directions”, Japanese Psychological Research, Vol. 64, Issue 2, Special Issue: Culture and Health, pp. 90–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12378

Murayama T. (2023), “Japan slides to record low 13th in most-cited science papers”, The Asahi Shimbun, August 9, 2023, available at: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14977820 (accessed April 19, 2024).

NISTEP (2024), National Institute of Science and Technology Policy official site, available at: https://www.nistep.go.jp/en/?page_id=1730 (accessed April 19, 2024).

North D. C., Wallis J. J. and Weingast B. R. (2009), Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575839

Oda M. (1998), “Maintaining science culture in Japan”, Nature, Vol. 391, 431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35011

Ogawa M. (1998), “A Cultural History of Science Education in Japan: an Epic Description”, in Cobern W. W. (ed.), Socio-Cultural Perspectives on Science Education, Science & Technology Education Library, Vol. 4, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 139–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5224-2_8

Shimada T. (2023), “Japanese Context of the ‘Good Manners’ of the Legates of the Tensho Embassy in Italy (1585): The Buke Kojitsu , the Ise, and Kyūshū”, Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale, Vol. 59, pp. 561–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/AnnOr/2385-3042/2023/01/021

Takahashi N. (2015), “Japanese Work Ethic and Culture”, Annals of Business Administrative Science, Vol. 14, pp. 261–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7880/abas.14.261

Takahashi N. (2020), “Simulation and organizational studies in Japan”, Annals of Business Administrative Science, Vol. 19, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7880/abas.0200227a

Watanabe M. and Kudo M. (2020), “Japan: Western science and Japanese culture”, in Gascoigne T., Schiele B., Leach J., Riedlinger M., with Lewenstein B. V., Massarani L. and Broks P. (eds), Communicating Science: A Global Perspective, Third edition, Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 521–538. DOI: https://doi.org:/10.22459/CS.2020.22

Zinchenko V. and Boichenko M. (2022), “Buddhist economics as a return to a rational model of economic management”, The Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues, Vol. XV, Issue 1, pp. 227–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.10032