THE QUESTION OF IDENTITY IN INDIAN REFORMERS’ DISCOURSE AFTER THE FIRST WORLD WAR: MADHAVIAH’S CASE

M. Usoltseva

doi:10.15407/orientw2018.01.088

THE QUESTION OF IDENTITY IN INDIAN REFORMERS’ DISCOURSE AFTER THE FIRST WORLD WAR: MADHAVIAH’S CASE

PDF

https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2018.01.088

M. Usoltseva

A. Yu. Krymskyi Institute of Oriental Studies, NAS of Ukraine

Abstract

The question of identity of the “educated Indians” during the colonial era is defined in historiography in terms of “ambivalence”, “schizophrenia”, “neurosis” etc. This demonstrates the attempts of researchers to explain the specific way of self-determination of Western-educated class of Indians, which breaks down into several parallel levels often being contradictory by nature. At the end of the First World War, the representatives of Western-educated Indians were deeply concerned by the issue of self-determination due to the activation of the liberation movement with the tendency to revive and preserve their own tradition on the one hand, along with the reproduction of Westernized values and habits on the other hand. The limited number of the specific studies regarding the identity question in colonial context in general as well as the lack of the works corresponding to a particular region, period or society of India motivated this research. Addressing the identity problems in the post-war prose of Madhaviah allowed to study the specific behavior of “educated Indians” of Madras presidency and to shed some light on the identity issues within South Indian context. The current case study represents an attempt to clarify in which way Madhaviah, the prominent social reformer and the pioneer in Tamil prose writing, defines the identity question in his post-war prose. His short stories were published in the influential newspaper of that time – The Hindu, which dealt with both the social reforms and the nationalism. Therefore, the paper discusses whether Madhaviah’s identity as a social reformer suffered due to the abovementioned dramatic events, and whether the reforming trend was in conflict with the nationalistic one in the Kusika’s short stories.

How to Cite

Usoltseva, M. (2018). THE QUESTION OF IDENTITY IN INDIAN REFORMERS’ DISCOURSE AFTER THE FIRST WORLD WAR: MADHAVIAH’S CASE. The World of the Orient, (1 (98), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2018.01.088

Article views: 71 | PDF Downloads: 40

Keywords

British Raj, Indian intellectuals, nationalism, prose, short story, Social Reforms, Western-educated Indians, “educated Indians”

References

Anjaneyulu D. (1976), Builders of Modern India: Kandukuri Veeresalingam, Publications Division, N.-Delhi.

Canny N., Marshall P. (1998), “The Nineteenth Century”, in The Oxford History of the British Empire, W. R. Louis, A. M. Low (Eds.), Vol. 3, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Chaganti A. (1996), Dr. Annie Besant and Her Contribution to Society and Politics: 1893–1933, Diss.: PhD in History, Hyderabad.

Chandrika K. (2011), “The Hindu”, in Kaminsky A. P., Long R. D. (Ed.), India Today: An Encyclopedia of Life in the Republic, ABC-CLIO, Vol. 1, pp. 313–315.

Chari A. J. (1999), “Social Purpose as Motif in Indian novel in English”, in Reddy K. V., Reddy P. B. (Ed.), The Indian Novel with a social purpose, Atlantic Publishers & Dist, pp. 9–18.

Chatterjee N. (2010), “English Law, Brahmo Marriage, and the Problem of Religious Difference: Civil Marriage Laws in Britain and India”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 524–552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417510000290

Chatterjee P. (1989), “Colonialism, Nationalism, and Colonialized Women: The Contest in India”, American ethnologist, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1989.16.4.02a00020

Ebeling S. (2010), Colonizing the realm of words: The transformation of Tamil literature in nineteenth-century south India, SUNU Series, New York.

Forbes. G. (2008), Women in modern India, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Frost C. M. (2006), “Bhakti and Nationalism in the Poetry of Subramania Bharati”, International Journal of Hindu Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-006-9019-z

Hancock M. (2001), “Home science and the nationalization of domesticity in colonial India”, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 871–903. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X01004048

Hatcher B. (2004), “Contemporary Hindu Thought”, in R. Rineheart (Ed.), Contemporary Hinduism: Ritual, Culture, and Practice, ABC-CLIO, pp. 179–211.

Jagirdar P.J. (1983), “Tilak and Ranade”, in Inamdar N. (Ed.), Political Thought and Leadership of Lokmanya Tilak, Concept Publishing Company.

Jones K. W. (1992), Religious controversy in British India: dialogues in South Asian, SUNY Press, New York.

Kailasapathy K. (2006), “The Relation of Tamil and Western Literature”, The Indian Review of World Literature in English, Vol. 2, No. 2.

Krishnan M., “Biographical Sketch. A. Madhaviah – A Verified Factual Record by M. Krishnan (Youngest son of A. Madhaviah)”, available at: http://madhaviah.org/MadhaviahWelcomeV11.htm (accessed December 28, 2017).

Madhaviah A. (1923), “Kusika’s Short Stories: ‘As Others See Us’, ‘My Queer Sammandhi’, ‘An Advertisement and Its Sequel Part 1’, ‘An Advertisement and Its Sequel Part 2’, ‘The Cup of Iniquity’, ‘Sundu in the Mill’, ‘The Last Straw’ ”, available at: http://madhaviah.org/MadhaviahWelcomeV11.htm (accessed December 15, 2017).

Madhaviah A. (1924), “Kusika’s Short Stories: ‘A Soul’s Tragedy’, ‘How the Ethiopian Changed His Skin’ ”, available at: http://madhaviah.org/MadhaviahWelcomeV11.htm (accessed December 15, 2017).

Madhaviah’s Family Archive, “An Introduction. A. Madhaviah”, available at: http://madhaviah.org/MadhaviahWelcomeV11.htm (accessed December 24, 2017).

Meenu B. (2017), “ ‘The Widow and the Wife’: Debating the ‘Woman’s Question’ in Muthumeenakshi”, Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 251–263. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v9n2.26

Pati B. (1996), India and the First World War, Atlantic Publishers & Dist.

Raman S. A. (2000), “Old norms in new bottles: Constructions of gender and ethnicity in the early Tamil novel”, Journal of Women’s History, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2000.0063

Raman S. A. (2005), A. Madhaviah: A Biography. And Muthumeenaksi [a novella], Oxford University Press, USA.

Shils E. (1961), The intellectual between tradition and modernity: The Indian situation, Mouton.

Shreenivas M. (2003), “Emotion, Identity, and the Female Subject: Tamil Women’s Magazines in Colonial India, 1890–1940”, Journal of Women’s History, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2003.0016

Srinivas M. N. (2005), Social Change in Modern India, Orient Longman, N.-Delhi.

Tajfel H. and Turner J. (2004), “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior”, in T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Key readings in social psychology. Political psychology: Key readings, Psychology Press, New York, pp. 276–293.

Tangri S. (1961), “Intellectuals and Society in Nineteenth-Century India”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 368–394. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500001079

REFERENCES