The Culture of Scientific Work: Philosophy and Experience of the Republic of Korea
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The modern Korean culture of scientific work has been formed for at least the last century and a half – since the beginning of modernization processes in this country. It is determined by the peculiarities of economic development in the Republic of Korea, as well as its national traditions. Korean scholars put forward a two-culture model to explain the public understanding of science, but this model can also be applied to understanding the Korean culture of scientific work. The philosophy of self-restraint and dedication to national interests has produced the effect that in Korean society in general and in Korean science in particular, harmony is achieved in certain issues where conflicts and misunderstandings continue in Western science. Thus, in the economic, political and cultural plane, a combination of elements of the limited access order and the open access order, which were conceptualized by Douglas North and co-authors as incompatible, is consistently traced. A developed culture of critical thinking does not degenerate into unlimited skepticism about science due to trust in science as the main source of acceleration of national modernization and growth of social well-being. Strict executive discipline at work, due to the thousand-year tradition of resistance to external aggression and the relatively recent semi-military rule of the third president of the Republic of Korea, General Park Chung-hee, does not turn into excessive authoritarianism in the economy thanks to the developed general democratic culture in the Republic of Korea and the reduction of the dominant influence of the chaebols in the economy. However, even today’s K-pop youth culture has some characteristics of chaebol corporate culture with its extreme commitment to shared values. The cultural gap between generations, which is inevitable during accelerated social modernization, does not develop into permanent political revolutions, because it is mitigated by the influence of religions and national traditions.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
culture of scientific work; chaebols; national traditions; philosophy of values; Republic of Korea; two-culture model
Acemoglu D. and Robinson J. (2019), The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty, Penguin publishers, New York.
Aghion P., Guriev S. and Jo K. (2021), “Chaebols and Firm Dynamics in Korea”, Economic Policy, Vol. 36, No. 108, pp. 593–626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiab016
Amsden A. H. (1992), Asia’s Next Giant. South Korea and Late Industrialization, Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195076036.001.0001
Beuthan R. (2020), “Brief aus Südkorea”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 289–303. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2020-0019 https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2020-0019
Burns J. H. R., Kapono C. A., Pascoe K. H. and Kane H. H. (2023), “The Culture of Science in Academia is Overdue for Change”, Oceanography, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 146–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2024.115
Cho M. H. (2014), “Technological catch-up and the role of universities: South Korea’s innovation-based growth explained through the Corporate Helix model”, Triple Helix, Vol. 1, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0002-1
Dayton L. (2020), “How South Korea made itself a global innovation leader. Systemic reform backed by strong investment has brought rapid and long-lasting results”, in Nature Index, May 28, available at: https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news/how-south-korea-made-itself-a-global-innovation-leader-research-science (accessed January 31, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01466-7
Gao X.-A. and Chung S.-Y. (2023), “Characterizing ‘New Korean Confucianism’: Focusing on Pak Chonghong and Yi Sang-ŭn’s Life and Thought”, Religions, Vol. 14, No. 2, 138. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel14020138 https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020138
Horkheimer M. and Adorno T. W. (1998), Dialectic of Enlightenment, Trans. John Cumming, Continuum, New York.
Jeong S. (2014), “Hangugeneun Hyeondaecheolhagi Issneunga?”, Journal of Humanities, Seoul National University, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 389–403. (In Korean). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17326/jhsnu.71.2.201405.389 https://doi.org/10.17326/jhsnu.71.2.201405.389
Kim H. H. (2022), “Metaphors in Neo-Confucian Korean philosophy”, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpac030
Kim H.-C. (2019), “Hangukcheolhagui Jeongcheseonggwa Hangukcheolhaksaui Gwanjeom”, Korean Thought and Culture, Vol. 100, pp. 1083–1107. (In Korean). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31037/ktac.100.36 https://doi.org/10.31037/KTAC.100.36
Kim S.-H. (2016), “Science and Technology: National Identity, Self-Reliance, Technocracy, and Biopolitics”, in Corner P. and Lim J.-H. (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Mass Dictatorship. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 81–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43763-1_7
Kim S.-H. (2017), “Science, Technology, and the Imaginaries of Development in South Korea”, Development and Society, Vol. 46, No. 2, Special Issue: Cosmopolitan Sociology and War Memory in East Asia, pp. 341–371.
Kim S.-H., Oh S.-H., Zain A., Heo Y. and Jun J. (2023), “Transition from Idealized Science to Culture of Skepticism in South Korea: Micro-Level Evidence for the Two-Culture Model of Public Understanding of Science”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 35, No. 3, edad026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edad026
Kim V. and Wakabayashi D. (2023), “What to Know About the Chaebol Families That Dominate South Korea’s Economy”, New York Times, Dec. 18, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/18/business/chaebol-south-korea.html (accessed January 31, 2024).
Lee C. (2023), “Self-Cultivation and Inwardness: How to Establish the Confucian Identity in Korean Neo-Confucianism”, Religions, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030331
Lee H. (2018), “Hangukcheolhagui Saeroun Jipyeong”, Journal of Korean Philosophical History, Vol. 11, No. 58, pp. 9–38. (In Korean). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35504/kph.2018..58.001
Lee K., Choi S. and Min J. W. (2019), “Discursive strategies of othering: North Korean youth on a South Korean television show”, Text & Talk, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 725–745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-0236
Lee T. (2012), “Philosophy as Self-examination and Korean Philosophy”, Journal of Philosophical Research, Vol. 37, Issue Supplement, pp. 353–360. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jpr201237supplement53
Lim C.-W. (2022), “Gimjunggeonui Sahoegaehyeoksasange Boineun Dogacheolhagui Munje”, Tae Dong Institute of classic research, Vol. 49, pp. 239–278. (In Korean). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31408/tdicr.2022.49.239
North D., Vallis J. J. and Weingast B. R. (2009), Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575839
Park K. (2018), “Irwon Philosophy and Social Engagement”, Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 83–90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/asrr201871246
Putro Z. A. E. and Pamungkas C. (2017), “Agama Khonghucu Dan Buddha dalam lintasan sejarah Korea”, Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 137. (In Indonesian). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/jkw.v8i2.779
Rocha Nayelli L. and Ryzhkov A. (2023), “How are Korean Men seen? Constructs among Mexican Women by Means of Hallyu”, Shìdnij svìt, No. 1, pp. 155–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2023.01.155
Santiago-Vendrell A. and Im M. (2023), “The World Was Their Parish: Evangelistic Work of the Single Female Missionaries from the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, to Korea, 1887–1940”, Religions, Vol. 14, No. 2, 262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020262
Studwell J. (2013), How Asia works. Success and Failure in the World’s Most Dynamic Region, Profile books, London.
Tomeczek A. (2023), “The rise of the chaebol: A bibliometric analysis of business groups in South Korea”, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Preprint, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371606045_The_rise_of_the_chaebol_A_bibliometric_analysis_of_business_groups_in_South_Korea (accessed January 31, 2024).
Yang M. S. (2020), “Luther’s Reformation and His Political and Social Ideas for Korean Church and Society”, Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, Vol. 40, Issue 2, pp. 237–253. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jsce202111838
Yoo W.-K. (2020), “Hanguksasanggwa Hangukcheolhak”, Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association, Vol. 93, pp. 359–383. (In Korean). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2020.93.014
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.