Eco-Consciousness in Vālmīki-Rāmāyaṇa: An Aesthetical Study of Ecological Integrity and Biodiversity
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The paper traces the expressions of eco-consciousness through an eco-aesthetical reading of the text of Rāmāyaṇa, the oldest Sanskrit epic. It brings to the fore the representation of ecological integrity, beauty of biodiversity, interrelations between different organisms of the ecosystem, and environmental knowledge through its analysis of the eco-religious/cultural practices prevalent during the Rāmāyaṇa-kāla (the period of Rāmāyaṇa). In this Anthropocene epoch, the sentiment of eco-caring has taken a back seat in human minds, leading to a severe ecological crisis. Humans have acquired dominance over the natural environment that jeopardises not only the lives of humans themselves but also of fellow beings. There is a need to revive aesthetic impulses in humans to keep up the symbiotic relations with nature. Aesthetics is an important tool for the appreciation of nature in its varied forms of everyday activities, which forms a link between ecological aesthetics and ethics. Further, the idea of ecological harmony is one of the key concepts of eco-aesthetics, which can be often seen in the text of Vālmīki-Rāmāyaṇa. While the epic has been approached from the ecological perspective by different scholars, there has not been any significant study that explores the eco-aesthetical dimension of the text. Keeping this gap in view, this article attempts to explore the relevance of eco-aesthetical method for addressing the issue considering simultaneously the contemporary discourse of eco-aesthetics. Also, the paper analyses the sentiment of eco-caring in light of various episodes of the epic. Finally, the summation of the paper accentuates the importance of eco-aesthetical sentiment to assist the reorientation of humans towards ecological attunement.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Vālmīki-Rāmāyaṇa, eco-aesthetics, ethics, harmony, anthropocene, religion, culture
Bartholomew I of Constantinople (2002), “Sacrifice: The Missing Dimension”, in The Orthodox Fellowship of the Transfiguration, available at: https://www.orth-transfiguration.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Library_HAH-Patriarch-Bartholomew-Address-on-Sacrifiice-Venice-Italy-2002.pdf (accessed March 22, 2021).
Bateson G. (1972), “The Root of Ecological Crisis”, in Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Ballantine Books, New York, pp. 488–493.
Bilimoria P., Prabhu J. and Sharma R. (2016), Indian Ethics: Classical Tradition and Contemporary Challenges: Volume I, Routledge, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315252445
Carlson A. (2018), “Environmental Aesthetics, Ethics, and Ecoaesthetics”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 76, Issue 4, pp. 399–410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12586
Carson R. (2000), Silent Spring, New Ed edition, Penguin UK.
Chapman J. L. and Reiss M. J. (2012), Ecology: Principles and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Chapple C. K. and Tucker M. E. (2000), Hinduism and ecology: the intersection of earth, sky, and water, Harvard Divinity School, MA, USA.
Cheng X. (2013), “On the Four Keystones of Ecological Aesthetic Appreciation”, in Simon C. Estok and Won-Chung Kim (eds), East Asian Ecocriticism: A Critical Reader, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 221–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137345363_13
Haberman D. L. (2017), “Hinduism”, in W. Jenkins, M. E. Tucker and J. Grim (eds), Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology, Routledge, NY, USA, pp. 35–42.
Haeckel E. (1914), The Natural History of Creation, Appleton, New York.
Holdrege B. A. (2004), “Dharma”, in Sushil Mittal and Gene R. Thursby (eds), The Hindu World, Routledge, New York.
Jain P. (2011), Dharma and Ecology of Hindu Communities: Sustenance and Sustainability, Ashgate, Surrey, England.
Lee D. (2000), “The Natural History of the Rāmāyaṇa”, in C. K. Chapple, and M. E. Tucker (eds), Hinduism & Ecology: The Intersection of Earth, Sky & Water, Harvard Divinity School, MA, USA, pp. 245–268.
Lutgendorf P. (2000), “City, Forest, and Cosmos: Ecological Perspectives from the Sanskrit Epics”, in C. K. Chapple, and M. E. Tucker (eds), Hinduism & Ecology: The Intersection of Earth, Sky & Water, Harvard Divinity School, MA, USA, pp. 269–290.
Miles M. (2014), Eco-Aesthetics: Art, Literature and Architecture in a Period of Climate Change (Radical Aesthetics-Radical Art), Bloomsbury Academic, London, UK.
Nadkarni N. M. (2017), “Ecology”, in W. Jenkins, M. E. Tucker and J. Grim (eds), Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology, Routledge, London, UK, pp. 412–419.
Narayanan V. (1997), “One Tree Is Equal to Ten Sons’: Hindu Responses to the Problems of Ecology, Population, and Consumption”, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 291–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/65.2.291
Nash J. (2016), “Review of People Trees: Worship of Trees in Northern India, by David L. Haberman”, The Journal of Hindu Studies, Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 362–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhs/hiw022
Nelson L. E. (2012), “Ecology”, in Brill’s Encyclopaedia of Hinduism, Vol. 4: History, Philosophy, Knowledge Traditions, Interreligious Contact, K. A. Jacobsen (ed.), Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden, pp. 663–676.
Orr A. (2017), “An Introduction to Eco-Theology”, A Church of Ireland Theological Journal, pp. 10–12.
Panov V. I. (2013), “Ecological Thinking, Consciousness, Responsibility”, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 86, pp. 379–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.583
Rambachan A. (2006), The Advait Worldview: God, World and Humanity, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Rolston H. (2002), “From Beauty to Duty: Aesthetics of Nature and Environmental Ethics”, in Arnold Berleant (ed.), Environment and the Arts: Perspectives on environmental Aesthetics, Hampshire and Burlington, VT, pp. 127–141.
Seed J. (1988), “Beyond Anthropocentricism”, in John Seed et al. (eds), Thinking like a Mountain: Towards a council of all Beings, New Catalyst Books Edition, Gabriola Island, pp. 35–40.
Sivaramakrishnan M. (2017), “Ecopoetics and the Literature of Ancient India”, in J. Parham and L. Westling (eds), A Global History of Literature and The Environment, Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316212578.006
Tucker M. E. and Grim J. (2000), “Series Foreword”, in C. K. Chapple and M. E. Tucker (eds), Hinduism and ecology: the intersection of earth, sky, and water, Harvard Divinity School, MA, USA, pp. XV–XXVII.
Thiyagarajan R. (2014), Ecotourism and Ecofriendly Environment as Depicted in Valmiki Rāmāyaṇa, Paper presented at GTU, February 17, 2014, available at: https://www.academia.edu/15360447/ECO_TOURISM_IN_VALMIKI_RĀMĀYAṆA (accessed July 10, 2021).
Tiwari Sh. (2010), “Origin of Environmental Science from Vedas”, in Sanskrit Vimarsha, pp. 156–170, available at: www.sanskrit.nic.in/SVimarsha/V2/c17.pdf (accessed May 17, 2021).
Tucker M. E. and Grim J. (2000), “Series Foreword”, in C. K. Chapple and M. E. Tucker (eds), Hinduism and ecology: the intersection of earth, sky, and water, Harvard Divinity School, MA, USA, pp. XV–XXVII.
Vālmīki-Rāmāyaṇa (2006), (With Sanskrit Text and English Translation), Part 1, Gita Press, Gorakhpur, India.
Vālmīki-Rāmāyaṇa (2006), (With Sanskrit Text and English Translation), Part 2, Gita Press, Gorakhpur, India.
White L. (1967), “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis”, Science, Vol. 155, No. 3767, pp. 1203–1207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203
Xiangzhan Ch. (2010), “Ecoaesthetics and Ecocriticism”, Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 785–789.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.