Bronze Okimono of the Meiji Era in Museums Collections of Ukraine: Miyao Company

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Svitlana Rybalko

  Anatoliy Shcherban

Abstract

The study is focused on a bronze sculpture of small forms (okimono) of the Meiji era, in particular, art pieces that came to Europe under the Miyao brand, from the collections of the Bohdan and Varvara Khanenko Museum of Art, Lviv National Art Gallery, Feldman Family Museum (Kharkiv). The article highlights the historiographical and terminological aspects of the research topic, outlines the principles of formation of the source base, attribution, and examination of the works; the positions of prominent scientists on the artistic assessment of bronze okimono are determined. The results of the study are a reconstructed context of the formation of a new type of bronze sculpture, highlighting the transformations that took place during the Meiji reforms in the organization of the artist’s work and aesthetic landmarks; the typology of bronze sculpture and the range of main plots are determined (characters of Shinto and Buddhist mythology, Taoist hermits, heroes of folk tales, plots from the life of peasants, aristocrats, bureaucrats). In the process of studying the collections, the attribution of a group of works, the analysis of their figurative and content structure and stylistic and technological component, the typology of signatures have been carried out. Miyao’s products have been found to be the result of the loss of the domestic market and reorientation of exports: the special role of metal products in international exhibitions, the influence of the European art system, and its organic combination with traditional Japanese crafts have been emphasized. It is shown that on such grounds as increased decorativeness, the use of elements of clothing and other details identified as Chinese, a significant part of Miyao art pieces can be considered as a modern (oriental) version of Chinoiserie, or a model of Oriental Orientalism. It is proved that bronze sculpture of small forms in artistic and technological senses is worthily represented in museum collections of Ukraine, demonstrates a variety of approaches and models, typologically can relate to both applied art and decorative sculpture of small forms. The fact of preservation of the tendency to imitate Miyao’s style among the masters of the late 19th century and early 21st century has been revealed.

How to Cite

Rybalko, S., & Shcherban, A. (2022). Bronze Okimono of the Meiji Era in Museums Collections of Ukraine: Miyao Company. The World of the Orient, (3 (116), 98-117. https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2022.03.098
Article views: 195 | PDF Downloads: 168

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

culture and art of Japan, Meiji era, bronze okimono, collections of the Japanese art in Ukraine, Miyao Company

References

ЛІТЕРАТУРА

Мещеряков А. Н. Император Мэйдзи и его Япония. Москва, 2006.

Рибалко С. Б. Зі Сходу на Захід: японська мініатюрна пластика з колекції О. Фельдмана. Харків, 2009.

Совершенство в деталях. Искусство Японии эпохи Мэйдзи, 1868–1912: частная коллекция: каталог выставки. Т. 2. / Вступ. статья, коммент.: А. И. Цирефман. Санкт-Петербург, 2016.

Успенский М. В. Нэцкэ. Ленинград, 1986.

Цирефман А. И. Японская металлическая пластика периода Мэйдзи (1868–1912 гг.) // Вестник Государственного университета культуры и искусств, 2012, № 3.

An illustrated catalogue of Japanese modern fine arts displayed at the Japan-British Exhibition, London, 1910 / compiled by the Office of the Imperial Japanese Government Commission to the Japan-British exhibition. Tokyo.

Anderson W. Pictorial Arts of Japan. With a Brief Historical Sketch of the Associated Arts, and Some Remarks upon the Pictorial Art of the Chinese and Korean. Boston, 1886.

Batchelor J. The Ainu and their folk-lore. London, 1901.

Bordignon L. The Golden Age of Japanese Okimono: The Dr. A. M. Kanter Collection. London, 2010.

Earle J. Splendors of Meiji: Treasures of Imperial Japan, Masterpieces from the Khalili Collection. St. Petersburg, Florida, Broughton International Publications, 1999.

Earle J. Splendors of Imperial Japan: Arts of the Meiji Period from the Khalili Collection. London, 2006.

Exposition Universelle Internationale de 1900. Catalogue special officiel du Japon. Paris, 1900.

Impey O., Fairley M. Metalwork in the Khalili Collection // Meiji no TakaraTreasures of Imperial Japan (Nasser D. Khalili Collections of Japanese art). Vol. II. London, 1995.

Harris V. Japanese imperial craftsmen: Meiji art from the Khalili collection. London, 1994.

Harris V. The Transition from Edo Practices to Meiji Enlightenment // Meijino Takara Treasures of Imperial Japan (Nasser D. Khalili Collections of Japanese art). Vol. II. London, 1995.

Mabuchi Akiko. Cernuschi et sa collection d’Okimono // Ebisu. No. 19. 1998. https://doi.org/10.3406/ebisu.1998.1614

Meiji Magic: Japan Gift to the West. New York, 2008.

Mutsu H. British Press and the Japan-British Exhibition of 1910. London, 2001.

Rybalko S. Lost pages in Japan’s Art History // Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (AJSSH). Oyama (Japan), November, 2012а.

Rybalko S. Okimono: a dialogue between East and West // The Asian Conference on Arts and Humanities, 2012: Conferences Proceedings, IAFOR. Osaka, 2012b.

Seton A. Collecting Japanese antiques. Boston, Rutland, Vermont, Tokyo, 2004.

Till B. The Arts of Meiji Japan, 1868–1912 Changing Aesthetics. Art Gallery of Greater Victoria, 1995.

Wichmann S. Japonisme: The Japanese Influence on Western Art since 1858. London, 1999.

国 雄行 「博覧会の時代:明治政府の政策」 2005年、東京.

内国勧業博覧会美術品出品目録 1996東京.

押切隆世「百年前の日本」 (セイラム・ピーボディー博物館蔵 / モース コレクション写真編) 1983 東京.

REFERENCES

Meshcheryakov A. N. (2006), Imperator Meydzi i ego Yaponiya, Natalis and Ripol Klassik, Moscow. (In Russian).

Rybalko S. B. (2009), Zi Skhodu na Zakhid: yapons’ka miniatyurna plastyka z kolektsiyi O. Fel’dmana, Folio, Kharkiv. (In Ukrainian).

Sovershenstvo v detalyakh. Iskusstvo Yaponii epokhi Meydzi, 1868–1912: chastnaya kollektsiya: katalog vystavki (2016), Vol. 2, Preface and comments by A. I. Tsirefman, Chistyy list, Saint Petersburg. (In Russian).

Uspenskiy M. V. (1986), Netske, Iskusstvo, Leningrad. (In Russian).

Tsirefman A. I. (2012), “Yaponskaya metallicheskaya plastika perioda Meydzi (1868–1912 gg.)”, Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv, No. 3. (In Russian).

An illustrated catalogue of Japanese modern fine arts displayed at the Japan-British Exhibition, London, 1910, Compiled by the Office of the Imperial Japanese Government Commission to the Japan-British exhibition, The Shimbi Shoin, Tokyo.

Anderson W. (1886), Pictorial Arts of Japan. With a Brief Historical Sketch of the Associated Arts, and Some Remarks upon the Pictorial Art of the Chinese and Korean, Houghton, Mifflin, and Company, Boston.

Batchelor J. (1901), The Ainu and their folk-lore, The Religious Tract Society, London.

Bordignon L. (2010), The Golden Age of Japanese Okimono: The Dr. A. M. Kanter Collection, Antique Collectors Club Dist, London.

Earle J. (1999), Splendors of Meiji: Treasures of Imperial Japan, Masterpieces from the Khalili Collection, Broughton International Publications, St. Petersburg, Florida.

Earle J. (2006), Splendors of Imperial Japan: Arts of the Meiji Period from the Khalili Collection, Khalili Collections, London.

Exposition Universelle Internationale de 1900. Catalogue special officiel du Japon (1900), Paris.

Impey O. and Fairley M. (1995), “Metalwork in the Khalili Collection”, in Meiji no Takara Treasures of Imperial Japan (Nasser D. Khalili Collections of Japanese art), Vol. II, The Kibo Foundation, London, pp. 32–45.

Harris V. (1994), Japanese imperial craftsmen: Meiji art from the Khalili collection, British Museum Press, London.

Harris V. (1995), “The Transition from Edo Practices to Meiji Enlightenment”, in Meijino Takara Treasures of Imperial Japan (Nasser D. Khalili Collections of Japanese art), Vol. II, British Museum Press, London, pp. 18–31.

Mabuchi Akiko (1998), “Cernuschi et sa collection d’Okimono”, Ebisu, No. 19, pp. 107–122. https://doi.org/10.3406/ebisu.1998.1614

Meiji Magic: Japan Gift to the West (2008), New York, Flying Cranes Antiques, p. 19.

Mutsu H. (2001), British Press and the Japan-British Exhibition of 1910, Melbourne Institute of Asian Languages and Societies, University of Melbourne.

Rybalko S. (2012а), “Lost pages in Japan’s Art History”, Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (AJSSH), Oyama (Japan), November, pp. 124–133.

Rybalko S. (2012b), “Okimono: a dialogue between East and West”, in The Asian Conference on Arts and Humanities, 2012: Conferences Proceedings, IAFOR, Osaka, pp. 82–94.

Seton A. (2004), Collecting Japanese antiques, Tuttle, Boston, Rutland, Vermont, Tokyo.

Till B. (1995), The Arts of Meiji Japan, 1868–1912 Changing Aesthetics, Art Gallery of Greater Victoria.

Wichmann S. (1999), Japonisme: The Japanese Influence on Western Art Since 1858, Thames & Hudson, London.

Kuni Takeyuki (2005), Hakurankai no jidai: Meiji seihu no hakurankai seisaku, Ivata Shōin, Tokyo. (In Japanese).

Naikoku kangyo hakurankai bijutsuhin shuppin mokuroku, ІІ (1996), Tokyo. (In Japanese).

Oshikiri Takashi yo hyakunenmae no Nihon (Sei ramu pоbodо hakubutsukan zō/ mōsu korekushon shashin-hen) (1983), Shōgakkan, Tokyo. (In Japanese).